Skip to content

Category: Economics

Being realistic

“Be realistic, demand the impossible”

Ken Knabb, editor and translator of The Situationist International Anthology, among other works, has posted an interesting essay about the COVID-19 crisis and its effects on us at his website, Bureau of Public Secrets:

We come to realize how much we miss certain things, but also that there are things we don’t miss. Many people have noted (usually with a half-guilty hesitation, since they are of course quite aware of the devastation that is going on in many other people’s lives) that they personally are appreciating the experience in some regards. It’s much quieter, the skies are clearer, there’s scarcely any traffic, fish are returning to formerly polluted waterways, in some cities wild animals are venturing into the empty streets. There has been much joking about how those who like quiet contemplative living are hardly noticing any difference, in contrast to the frustrations and anxieties of those who are used to more gregarious lifestyles. In any case, whether they like it or not, millions of people are getting a crash course in cloistered living, with repeated daily schedules almost like monks in a monastery. They may continue to distract themselves with entertainments, but the reality keeps bringing them back to the present moment.

I suspect that the frantic urgency of various political leaders to get things “back to normal” as soon as possible is not only for the ostensible economic reasons, but also because they dimly sense that the longer this pause goes on, the more people will become detached from the addictive consumer pursuits of their previous lives and the more they will be open to exploring new possibilities.

“Pregnant Pause — Remarks on the Corona Crisis”

I have no idea what will happen next, and make no predictions, but it is remarkable how much of what was “normal” or “common sense” back in early March seems like ancient history—or insanity—now. Even capitalist newspapers like the Financial Times have been talking about establishing universal basic income, a mostly fringe idea back when Occupy Wall Street was happening, nine years ago.

Earlier today I had the thought that the current crisis was making me realize that the punks of my teens and twenties, who were ignored or disdained by “serious” people, had been basically correct about everything: the state is corrupt, corporations are bad, factory farming kills (animals and us), local mutual aid is preferable to international logistics and supply lines, living cheaply and cooperatively can lead to a richer life, etc. Which I guess means it’s time for me, in my late forties, to become a bicycle-riding vegan anarchist, get a part-time job at a co-op, start a ‘zine or a band, serve free food in public parks, etc.!

Art after COVID-19

(From Raising Arizona)

Yesterday I went through some of my old composition books after cleaning up my desk, and stumbled across a quote I wrote down in February 2014 and then forgot:

It is not the office of art to spotlight alternatives, but to resist by its form alone the course of the world, which permanently puts a pistol to men’s heads.

Theodor Adorno, “Commitment”

As usual with Adorno, I find it a bit difficult to understand exactly what he means—”resist by its form alone”?—but also intriguing. Art is not just a harmless pastime, a luxury for our “down times”. It’s our ally as we face a world that’s pointing a gun at us.

And although many of us, including me, are so far spending most of our COVID-19 quarantine time in the comfort of our own homes, for “essential” workers—health-care, food service, and grocery store workers—the suddenly unemployed, the people who can’t pay their bills or rent, and more, the world’s gun is at their head.

As a writer (or any other kind of artist), do we have anything to offer them better than a temporary escape? Can we help them resist? Art is not a substitute for providing them material support—honoring strikes, joining in mutual aid efforts, demanding our governments support and protect us—but it’s something worth pondering as we try to make art for others as well as ourselves in a difficult time, under difficult circumstances. Because sooner or later the gun is pointed at all of us.

Base services

Yesterday was the birthday of Karl Marx, so I decided to dip into a section of Capital, Volume 1, I hadn’t read yet to celebrate. And in footnote 12 of chapter 27, I found Marx suggesting that in 1695 William of Orange (King William III of England) granted a large property in Ireland, confiscated after winning the Williamite War there, to his mistress, Lady Orkney, because of her fellatio skills. He quotes a manuscript as follows:

“On the private moral character of this bourgeois hero, among other things: ‘The large grant of lands in Ireland to Lady Orkney, in 1695, is a public instance of the king’s affection, and the lady’s influence…Lady Orkney’s endearing offices are supposed to have been foeda labiorum ministeria.'”

Karl Marx, Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 27, Note 12

In the Penguin Classics edition I have, the Latin is translated in a footnote to the footnote as “base services performed with the lips.”

That’s on page 844, which is admittedly a long way to read to get to a dirty part, but don’t ever let anyone tell you history or economics are dull, and always read the footnotes!